Criminological Theories

2287 Words10 Pages
There are many types of criminal offenders and no matter what their offence may be, all offenders have important psychological and criminological explanations that have motivated and influenced their behaviour. Ongoing analysis of criminal offending has delivered useful information and theoretical evidence to the field of criminology that aids in the identification of the significant triggers that influence a person to become criminal. As for John Martin Crawford, a Canadian serial murderer that sexually assaulted female aboriginal sex workers, the motivational factors behind his criminality and deviance are demonstrated in criminological terms through Marshall and Barbaree’s Integrated Theory of the Etiology of Sexual Offending theory, and…show more content…
Crawford and Serloin drank beer and had sexual intercourse, and at the end of the night, Serloin was found dead and beaten behind a local fire hall with bite marks on her body. She passed away from being beaten to death, and ultimately, choking on her own blood and vomit. Crawford had originally denied accusations of killing and biting Serloin, but after police investigation, Crawford admitted that he beat her to stop her from choking. The police offered Crawford a plea bargain of manslaughter under section 232 of the Criminal Code of Canada, as opposed to first-degree murder of Mary Jane Serloin, which John plead guilty to, and served 10 years in prison. Crawford’s second offence occurred in Saskatchewan where he lived with his mother after his release from prison. He murdered 16-year-old aboriginal woman, Shelley Napope. During his trail, evidence from Crawford’s friend and police informant Bill Corrigan, concluded to the court that he was with Crawford when he “picked up Napope in the spring of 1992…they drove south of town, where Crawford forced Napope to have sex, then dragged her into some bushes and stabbed her” (Hoffman & Sheane,…show more content…
During the investigation, an anthropologist named Ernie Walker concluded that the deceased women had died two years prior to the investigation” and the RCMP uncovered that Crawford worked with his mother, “who operate[d] a private home for poor men” (Canadian Press Newswire, 1995). With the undercover help of Bill Corrigan, Crawford’s close friend, the authorities recorded Crawford admitting to the murders of Shelley Napope, Eva Tysup, and Calinda Waterhen, who were all Canadian aboriginal sex workers. Crawford was convicted for one count of first-degree murder under section 231 of the Criminal Code of Canada for the murder of Shelley Napope, and two counts of 2nd degree murder, section 231(7) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the murders of Eva Taysup and Calinda Waterhen, with no parole for 25 years. The judge, Mr. Justice David Wright explained how they could only charge Crawford second degree murder for Taysup and Waterhen, because there wasn’t any evidence to prove that his actions were planned and deliberated (Hoffman & Sheane, 1996). In court, John Martin Crawford remained silent about his actions, and the Judge, Mr. Justice David Wright, used Crawford’s lack of remorse as evidence against him (Goulding, 2001) Furthermore, in 2000, John Martin Crawford applied for appeal, which immediately got rejected. John Martin Crawford is currently serving life imprisonment in
Open Document