Cause And Effect In David Hume's Understanding Of Ideas
300 Words2 Pages
David Hume argues that individuals point to cause and effect when our understanding of ideas or events cannot be explained from perception alone. He cautions that humans should not rush to judgement on what will be the conclusion from a simple examination. Experience is what leads to causality for us, based on prior exposure we might conclude one action eventually results in the other. Hume states this illogical but it is expected since this is human nature we are speaking of. A good illustration of this is one might reason all liquid is water, this could be concluded with prior exposure to interacting with water. However not all liquid is H2O, oil is liquid yet it is not what was concluded. Again this shows the flaws in what David Hume’s spoke