1532 Words7 Pages

Introduction
William Sharp (1964) and John Lintner (1965) develop the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which also pioneered the birth of asset pricing models. CAPM was inferred based upon the Markowitz’s (1959) theory. The theory pointed out that investors are risk averse and they are trying to find a portfolio, containing risky assets that will maximize the portfolio expected return for a given level of portfolio risk. Capital Asset Pricing Model assumes investors are risk averse and it also states how investors measure the relationship among risk and expected return. Specifically, the model suggests that there is a linear relation among risk premium and expected return, which can be depicted by beta. The basic idea behind the model is that beta*…show more content…*

CAPM was inferred based upon the Markowitz’s (1959) theory. The theory pointed out that investors are risk averse and they are trying to find a portfolio, containing risky assets that will maximize the portfolio expected return for a given level of portfolio risk. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes investors are risk averse and it also states how investors measure the relationship among risk and expected return. Specifically, the model suggests that there is a linear relation among risk premium and expected return, which can be described by beta (β). The basic idea behind this model is that beta (β) is the only risk investors need to bear when holding an asset, and they call it systematic risk or market risk or undiversified risk. In 1993, based on CAPM, Fama and French develop a three-factor model, containing two more factors, i.e. book-to-market and size factor. The comprehensive three factors are market factor, which mainly illustrated by CAPM, book-to-market ratio and market capitalization. Fama and French successfully point out that book-to-market ratio and market capitalization are the two factors that can affect stock returns and could be used to explain the asset return deviation, which cannot be captured by CAPM. There is also a linear relationship among the expected return of the asset and the three factors. Thereafter, Carhart (1997) adds momentum to Fama and French three-factor model, which signals the birth of Carhart Four-Factor model. The forth factor is considered to be related to investor behaviour. Investors will buy those assets that perform quite well and sell those that perform badly in the past. Investors may make excess profits based on the past performance of the assets. This profit is called momentum profit. The trading philosophy behind the model is that it may have some correlation between

CAPM was inferred based upon the Markowitz’s (1959) theory. The theory pointed out that investors are risk averse and they are trying to find a portfolio, containing risky assets that will maximize the portfolio expected return for a given level of portfolio risk. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes investors are risk averse and it also states how investors measure the relationship among risk and expected return. Specifically, the model suggests that there is a linear relation among risk premium and expected return, which can be described by beta (β). The basic idea behind this model is that beta (β) is the only risk investors need to bear when holding an asset, and they call it systematic risk or market risk or undiversified risk. In 1993, based on CAPM, Fama and French develop a three-factor model, containing two more factors, i.e. book-to-market and size factor. The comprehensive three factors are market factor, which mainly illustrated by CAPM, book-to-market ratio and market capitalization. Fama and French successfully point out that book-to-market ratio and market capitalization are the two factors that can affect stock returns and could be used to explain the asset return deviation, which cannot be captured by CAPM. There is also a linear relationship among the expected return of the asset and the three factors. Thereafter, Carhart (1997) adds momentum to Fama and French three-factor model, which signals the birth of Carhart Four-Factor model. The forth factor is considered to be related to investor behaviour. Investors will buy those assets that perform quite well and sell those that perform badly in the past. Investors may make excess profits based on the past performance of the assets. This profit is called momentum profit. The trading philosophy behind the model is that it may have some correlation between

Related

## Capital Atset Pricing Model: The Capital Asset Pricing Model

891 Words | 4 PagesThe capital asset pricing model (CAPM) serves as a model for the pricing of risky securities. CAPM believes that the expected return of a security or a portfolio equals the rate on a risk-free security plus a risk premium. If this expected return does not meet the required return, the investment should not be taken. The CAPM helps us to calculate investment risk and what return we can expect on the investment we have invested in. Systematic Risk is risk in the market that cannot be avoided. Some

## Harry Markowitz's Capital Asset Variance Model

1227 Words | 5 PagesHarry Markowitz is highly regarded as a pioneer in theoretical justification of investor’s behavior and development of optimization model for portfolio selection process. In 1990, Markowitz shared a Nobel Prize for his contributions to financial economics and corporate finance, the first time presented in his “Portfolio Selection” (1952) and more extensively in his monography “Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification (1959). His seminal works formed the foundation of what is now popularly known

## Punjab National Bank Sensitivity Analysis

5619 Words | 23 Pages10% sensitivity factor may be applied in highly volatile industries by assessing the expected volatility in sale price/ cost price of major raw materials in future on case to case basis. Techno-Economic Viability

## CAPM: A Capital Asset Pricing Model

1921 Words | 8 Pages1. Abstract CAPM is a capital asset pricing model for securities where it postulates a straightforward relationship between its market risk and expected return. It was introduced by William F. Sharpe and Linter in the 1960s and it sets the foundation for establishing the relationship between risk and return. Despite its popularity, it is not without limitations. As there is no one perfect solution for every problem, supplementary/alternative models (APT and three factor model) will be discussed in

## Disadvantages Of Domino Contagion

1905 Words | 8 Pagesbank failures. A key assumption common to these models is that the price of the assets that financial institutions have in their balance sheets is fixed. However, a model assuming this may lead to too conservative results, since banks often operate in highly volatile markets and this provides an additional channel through which contagion can spread through the system. The distinction

## Indian Commodity Market Case Study

1144 Words | 5 Pagesworld. With the globalization and advances in technology the commodity trading has become feasible for market participants. The recent policy changes paved way for investors to play in the commodity market and that lead the commodities to emerge as an asset class and get shares in their portfolio. The market efficiency is one of the important feature that gives confidence for the investors to trade in any market. This also fits to the Indian commodity market. The precious metals such as Gold and Silver

## Dividend Management Literature Review

3676 Words | 15 Pagesis 100%. Criticism Walter’s model is very helpful to demonstrate the impacts of dividend strategy on all equity firms under distinctive assumptions about the rate of return. However, the basic nature of the model can prompt conclusions which are not yet valid in general, however valid for Walter’s model. The criticisms on the model are as follows: Walter’s model of share valuation blends dividend strategy with investment strategy of the company. The model expects that the investments chances

## Pavlov Wachter Model Analysis

3485 Words | 14 PagesIn the case of Malaysia, the relationship coefficients always posit what the Pavlov-Wachter model advocates. The certainty interims for both callings of relationship factors demonstrate that the outcomes are critical. For Indonesia, the relationship coefficient that exists between the land value list and

## Pros And Cons Of Mobile Banking

1395 Words | 6 PagesDirect transfer of funds to beneficiary account through different schemes- Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna 3. Use of technology- Mobile Banking 4. Business Correspondent model These solutions have been tried and tested under different circumstances and they each have their own unique pros and cons. We tried to have a comparative study of the above solutions to check which fits the current solution fits best to India’s situation. New Banking Licenses While conventional banks have

## Edelweiss Capital Limited Case Study

5553 Words | 23 PagesINTRODUCTION EDELWEISS CAPITAL LIMITED Edelweiss capital limited is listed amongst the India’s leading provider of financial services. The range of services offered varies from providing investment banking, institutional equities, private client broking, asset management and investment advisory services, wealth management, insurance broking and wholesale financing services to large firms and individuals SUCCESS STORY Rakish Shah, a Gujarati businessman was the first one in his family to study in an English-medium

### Capital Atset Pricing Model: The Capital Asset Pricing Model

891 Words | 4 Pages### Harry Markowitz's Capital Asset Variance Model

1227 Words | 5 Pages### Punjab National Bank Sensitivity Analysis

5619 Words | 23 Pages### CAPM: A Capital Asset Pricing Model

1921 Words | 8 Pages### Disadvantages Of Domino Contagion

1905 Words | 8 Pages### Indian Commodity Market Case Study

1144 Words | 5 Pages### Dividend Management Literature Review

3676 Words | 15 Pages### Pavlov Wachter Model Analysis

3485 Words | 14 Pages### Pros And Cons Of Mobile Banking

1395 Words | 6 Pages### Edelweiss Capital Limited Case Study

5553 Words | 23 Pages