Bartleby The Scrivener

893 Words4 Pages
Herman Melville is the author of the short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener”. It tells about a man named Bartleby who is employed to a wall street lawyer. Over the course of this story Bartleby begins to answer every question and request asked of him with a simple and repetitive phrase, “I would prefer not to.” Bartleby’s catch phrase at first implies that he might be willing to obey under the correct circumstances. This allowance, which offers the narrator civility, is clearly a deception. Bartleby outright refuses any request made upon him. I’ve found his repeated statement to be huge paradox in the story and within Bartleby himself as a character. By saying he he “would prefer” he seems to be willing to concede while in actuality he is not…show more content…
In Melville’s short story when Nippers says Bartleby should "be kicked out"(par. 44) for not participating, Bartleby does just what Thoreau believes one should do if confronted with force, as "a minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority"(Thoreau, Civil Disobedience). Bartleby simply and passively continues on with his resistance, which is the only ‘power’ he truly has in this story, and a significant one at that. The narrator, already being characterized as a generous person by putting up with his other employee’s oddities, says this about Bartleby’s, “Nothing so aggravates an earnest person as a passive resistance. If the individual so resisted be of a not inhumane temper, and the resisting one perfectly harmless in his passivity; then, in the better moods of the former, he will endeavor charitably to construe to his imagination what proves impossible to be solved by his judgment.” (para. 53) The narrator cannot find a good enough reason at the beginning of Bartleby’s refusals to stand against them. Bartleby is not doing anything particularly wrong by calmly preferring to simply sit and write his copy. The narrator feels the need to keep Bartleby on staff because he fears “he will fall in with some less indulgent employer, and then he will be rudely treated, and perhaps…show more content…
It is easy to spot examples of the narrator accommodating Bartleby time and time again. There were three cases in the story when Bartleby refused to help the narrator review the copies he himself had made. Instead of putting his foot down the narrator calls in other people to do Bartleby's work for him. Rather than addressing the problem he simply pushes it off and works around Bartleby’s defiance. He works around the clog. The narrator in paragraph 84 acknowledges his compliance to Bartleby's unusualness by saying, “how could a human creature with the common infirmities of our nature, refrain from bitterly exclaiming upon such perverseness—such unreasonableness. However, every added repulse of this sort which I received only tended to lessen the probability of my repeating the inadvertence.” The narrator begins to feel almost awkward when asking things of Bartleby. After refusing to review copy for the third time the narrator tries to offer Bartleby tasks that he thinks he find more pleasing, like running to the near by post office or fetching someone from the next room. Again Bartleby “prefers not to”, and the narrator eventually, sensing this disagreement cannot be solved, simply moves away. He changes in order to avoid the problem all
Open Document