1905 Revolution Causes

730 Words3 Pages
The 1905 revolution had little impact but it is important to know that the Bloody Sunday which sparked 1905 revolution was starting point where the bond between the tsar and the people was heavily severed. This caused loss of popular support for Nicholas II. The Russian Revolution of 1905 was not a sudden event, but rather the culmination of years of discontent caused by several factors which were the poor economic condition of the peasantry, who had seen little improvement in their lives following emancipation, the autocratic nature in Nicholas II’s rule, which distanced him from the population. There was an economic recession in the early years of the 20th century, which resulted in high rates of unemployment and mass unrest was met with…show more content…
These delivered in the October Manifesto, which promised free speech and an elected assembly called the Duma, whose agreement would be needed before any laws could be passed. Although Nicholas II initially promised greater liberties and said the Duma would have the power to act to ensure these liberties were upheld, he did not allow the Duma to elect its own ministers, and he claimed the right to discharge the council whenever he wanted. Reaction to the October manifesto was divided. Many of the rebels felt that their voices had been heard, and that the landowner would have to accept their demands. However, minority of extreme revolutionaries, including the Bolsheviks felt that the Manifesto did not go far enough in addressing the grievances of the Russian people. There was some armed resistance, but the tsar’s soldiers suppressed this, and its seemed for a time that stability would return to…show more content…
He proved unwilling to enforce the reforms that he had promised and issued the Fundamental Laws, which asserted his full autocratic powers. The police and the army continued to harass real or imagined critics of the tsarist regime, it is estimated that 15,000 people were killed and 70, 000 arrested within a year. The first statement of the fundamental laws was that supreme autocratic power belongs to the tsar. This denied the hopes of those who saw the Duma as a means of bringing more representative government to Russia. The tsar could introduce laws and could veto those passed by the Duma. Minister were still appointed by the tsar, who controlled military and foreign
Show More
Related

  • How Were Their Decisions Significant To WWI?

    1459 Words  | 6 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policies of Bismarck vs. Kaiser Wilhelm. How were their decisions significant to WWI? (At least three paragraphs). (9 PTS) The differences between Otto von Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm II in the way they handled foreign policy is noted throughout their careers. Otto von Bismarck was a strong strategist who managed to unite all of Germany and increase its position in Europe. He did this in many different ways. When he was the Prime Minister of Prussia, he

    Read More

  • Meiji Restoration Effects

    1010 Words  | 5 Pages

    nation to open up its doors to the world and agree to unfair treaties . In order not to succumb to this start to Western colonization in the near future and recognizing how far behind Western countries it was, Japan began an intense program of westernization, industrialization, and modernization known as the Meiji Restoration (1868 – 1905) . These reforms had three major effects: Japanese economic prosperity, political peace and stability in Japan, and

    Read More

  • Igor Stravinsky Accomplishments

    1659 Words  | 7 Pages

    music revolution is what truly transcended him into international stardom. Through the discussion of his life, his work, and his influence the reason

    Read More

More about 1905 Revolution Causes

Open Document