videos on these three studies, my mind filled with thoughts of worry and concern. Each of these studies were a bit unethical in my eyes. It is like the experimenters had no sympathy or morally concern for the participants and the damage that the experiments did to them. They were so determined to get the end results they predicted that they would go to extensive lengths to achieve just that. The Stanford Prison Study study was conducted to discover the way people who are incarcerated behave in such
Tuskegee syphilis study (TSS) was so painful study to the humanity. They chose the African American male because they were so discriminated doctors. And these people was so poor and not educated so that let them cooperated to the study easy .It was very unfair and dishonest experiment. All the study members got investigation and interviewed even the nurse Miss River. It was very unethical experiment that will not be happed again with all regulation authority we have today. (All the facts in the
state and they’ll say yes to anything.” In the notorious research scandals of the 1960s and ‘70s, the common element was exploitation. With the Tuskegee syphilis study, it was exploitation of poor black men in Alabama; with the Willowbrook hepatitis study it was exploitation of the disabled, institutionalized children; with the Holmesburg Prison experiments it was exploitation of prisoners. In each case, researchers with power took advantage of vulnerable populations, getting them to “volunteer” for
dehumanization when people only see someone’s color and not the whole person. Peele’s direct attack on the extremist view of cultural appropriation creates a storyline long overdue for the lives of blacks like Henrietta Lacks, men in the Tuskegee Syphilis experiments, and Sarah Baartman whose bodies were commodities