The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

458 Words2 Pages
The actions of the criminal justice system may not always be found as universally acceptable. Plea bargaining constitutes as one such practice in which there is a major variation in opinion in relation to its suitability. Legal Information Institute (n. d.) “Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors where defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors.” Essentially, it is intelligible that some members of society would disapprove of the use of plea bargains. For example, if it is elected for a plea bargain to be proposed in a case, it may, at best, be viewed as the offender escaping the full extent of well-deserved consequences for their crimes or an utter miscarriage of justice at worst.…show more content…
Ultimately, the unfortunate reality of the situation is that the system retains only a limited amount of resources and it is already constrained with an enormous backlog of cases. Thus, the system simply is not in the position to try every matter that is introduced to the prosecutor. Moreover, the presentation of a plea deal may a necessary alternative to a court proceeding in order for the most optimal outcome to be obtained. Orthmann and Hess (2013) “An excellent investigation and report may cause the defendant to plead guilty, the defendant may desire to plead guilty without going through a trial, or the plea-bargaining process may bring about a satisfactory resolution” (p. 656). Essentially, the prosecutor may be the party with the distinct advantage and avoiding a trial can allow for prosecutors to dedicate their time to cases that are more demanding in

More about The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Open Document