The Kite Runner And The Things They Carried Comparative Essay
510 Words3 Pages
The novel The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini and Tim O’Brien’s book The Things They Carried both lead on a specific perspective and demonstrate two almost completely contrary ideas on life and its values. Yet they equally comment on the basic significance of how something is affected, specifically by the factor war and internal struggles. While the texts remark on opposed cultures and structures of their texts, similarly the authors express their understanding of the truth and the differentiation between correct or incorrect, right or wrong, and true or false.
It is to be acknowledged that these texts allure separate groups of audience and assist individual purposes. The Kite Runner is a novel that was seemingly an original way to write about the history of Afghanistan. It illustrates the common difficulty of identity and culture within. Readers with a connection to this topic or relation to a similar one are likely to recognize the thought behind certain integrations. Tim O’Brien’s book, on the other hand, is more attractive to those who would like to read about the Vietnamese war or those who are interested in a special perspective on the lives of soldiers in war. Readers of this text, are committed to multiple smaller stories, intrigued by the question whether a story is true or not, in contrast to, one…show more content… They direct their stories on the lines of the misconceptions the world has and how easily something is influenced, specifically how external forces can manipulate judgment. Both stories, in their own way, include sacrifice and suffer. Khaled Hosseini showed that sacrifice and suffer is a part of achieving a wanted result and receiving what is valued. Tim O’Brien, in contrast to this, was specific about the values of the soldiers and proves their sacrifice and suffers by uncovering the weight of the items they