The Handmaid's Tale By Margaret Atwood

848 Words4 Pages
The Glass Ceiling they will Never be Able to Cross "Your social circumstance determines much, if not all, of your life" - H. Bertens. In his critical essay entitled, "The politics of class: Marxism," the author stands to say that one’s social class determines almost all aspects of one’s life, the type of childhood one can have, the type of education one can achieve, the type of opportunities one will get. This is how far humanity has advanced; thin green 3x5 paper notes rule the world, children raised in these households get an easy two inch aim to the bullseye of success, children raised in third world countries must take the shot eyes closed thirty miles away. This is reality, this is oppression. The philosophy of Marxism explores that a wealthier, more dominant class subordinates a lower class and…show more content…
The division between these two classes and the oppression of the lower class is clearly indisputable in Margaret Atwood’s international bestseller, The Handmaids Tale as well as Neill Blomkamp’s award winning film, Elysium. The bourgeoisie, the upper class in both pieces of work oppress the lower class by prohibiting basic human rights and limiting their scope of opportunities to advance in life. Even though, both The Handmaids Tale and Elysium oppress the lower class by prohibiting basic human rights and limiting their scope to advance, the Gileadean Totalitarian Regime in The Handmaids Tale severely oppresses women by constraining individualism and committing sexist acts to handicap them. Both pieces of work oppress the lower class by prohibiting basic human rights. In The Handmaid’s Tale, individuality is a liberty only the wealthy can afford, the Handmaids are all bound under the same red significant clothing, names that correspond back to their owners, and the same economic status. The totalitarian regime strips the Handmaids of their individuality by treating them like property and not like individuals, they do
Open Document