Social Criticism In Flatland

910 Words4 Pages
"Flatland" by Edwin Abbot presents a whole new world that leaves one to ponder about higher powers to life and alternate dimensions. The unique book provides for different methods of exposing and critiquing. Social criticism in the book (gender, irregularity, or hierarchies) play a part in the dimension within the society. The rare combination of mathematics in writing issue distinctions and rankings at least the same, if not, far more than what any newspaper or journalist do. Abbot utilizes the language of mathematics to criticize his dimension. Making practical use of the language of mathematics develops mathematical examples and allegories. In this case, the analogy links the looked down upon "people" which has far more to do with just the gender or race this time. "Although popularly everyone called a Circle is deemed a Circle, yet among the better educated Classes it is known that no Circle is really a Circle, but only a Polygon with a very large number of very small sides. As the number of the sides increases, a Polygon approximates to a Circle; and, when the number is very great indeed, say for example three or four hundred, it is extremely difficult for the most delicate touch to feel any polygonal angles. Let me say rather, it would be difficult: for, as I have shown above, Recognition by Feeling is unknown among the highest society, and to feel a Circle would be considered a…show more content…
The significance corresponds with the various avenues of critiquing that takes place. Social criticism in the book with the incorporation mathematics in writing issue distinctions where Abbot criticizes his and other dimensions and the society that it

    More about Social Criticism In Flatland

      Open Document