Rational Decision-Making Model

790 Words4 Pages
The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits they might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…show more content…
It suggests that a certain person usually committed an offense depending on or influenced by the existing opportunities of crime. Some people decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs or wants. In this, rational choice theory implies that offenders can be deterred by blocking criminal opportunities making the crime more difficult, risky, less rewarding or less excusable. Rational choice theory views the desires preferences and motives of offenders and potential offenders. It also views the decision making of an individual. According to Cornish and Clarke, 1986 when a person wants to commit a criminal action, it is based on their decision or choice by existing opportunities of a crime on how to deal with it. And it also provides and to fulfill their basic needs. Rational choice theory is a belief for the idea or opinion, but not all decision or reason is right it is considered if that is a correct way of doing something. Rational choice perspective provides as a theory for practice and viewing criminal behavior of an individual. Karl Popper gives special attention to the advantages of using the presumption of rationality which is the reason that is not truly right or that has not been proven, he believe of this kind of method. The main purpose of this is to analyze the occurrence of crime events. Offenders are contributing for ongoing…show more content…
It suggests that a certain person usually committed an offense depending on or influenced by the existing opportunities of crime. Some people decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs or wants. In this, rational choice theory implies that offenders can be deterred by blocking criminal opportunities making the crime more difficult, risky, less rewarding or less excusable. Rational choice theory views the desires preferences and motives of offenders and potential offenders. It also views the decision making of an individual. According to Cornish and Clarke, 1986 when a person wants to commit a criminal action, it is based on their decision or choice by existing opportunities of a crime on how to deal with it. And it also provides and to fulfill their basic needs. Rational choice theory is a belief for the idea or opinion, but not all decision or reason is right it is considered if that is a correct way of doing something. Rational choice perspective provides as a theory for practice and viewing criminal behavior of an individual. Karl Popper gives special attention to the advantages of using the presumption of rationality which is the reason that is not truly right or that has not been proven, he believe of this kind of method. The main purpose of this is to analyze the occurrence of crime events. Offenders are contributing for ongoing

More about Rational Decision-Making Model

Open Document