‘sexual citizen’ is ‘a harbinger of a new politics of intimacy and everyday life’, a ‘hybrid being’ arising from the ‘intermingling of the personal and public’ and made possible by the shift towards detraditionalization, egalitarianism and autonomy in late
one respects and from whom one expects respect, face on, held high, rigid and tends towards a posture of standing giving others the most honorable image that seems to be the expression of an unconscious intention. One expects photography to give a narrative symbolism Bourdieu says, and as a sign or, more precisely, an allegory, unequivocally to express a transcendental meaning and increase the notations which could unambiguously constitute the virtual discourse which it is supposed to bear. The desire
100cr club, irrespective of the fact that if the movie has any substance in terms of narrative, acting, cinematic skills etc. But yes, the 1990's were tough period when it came to producing contemporary cinema, in terms of content, thought, and also production values. On one hand low budget movies were churned out and on the other hand, there were these art- house films, which kept the appreciation and understanding of good cinema alive. So today when this so called Popular Cinema
Woman: God’s second mistake? Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher, who regarded ‘thirst for power’ as the sole driving force of all human actions, has many a one-liners to his credit. ‘Woman was God’s second mistake’, he declared. Unmindful of the reactionary scathing criticism and shrill abuses he invited for himself, especially from the ever-irritable feminist brigade. The fact and belief that God never ever commits a mistake, brings Nietzsche’s proclamation dashingly down into the dust bin