have pointed the discrepancy in the narrative that the whole episode of witch hunting in Europe was initiated by the scientific community which is not true; it was instead the church which was opposed to female emancipation. In case of the India it misses the role of religious beliefs and traditions which led to apathy of women. It vehemently conveys the message that modern scientific knowledge has resulted in discrimination of all other forms of knowledge for its legitimization and dominance and has
the destruction of the nature are the result of the patriarchal and capitalist system of the society. All eco-feminist tries bringing up the relation and subordination of women in nature, through various lenses. Here Merchant (1992) discus on various lens of eco-feminism as radical eco-feminist, social ec0-feminst, cultural eco feminist. The radical eco-feminist analyzes the environmental problems and women’s subordination within the patriarchal and offers alternatives of this could liberate the
Woman: God’s second mistake? Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher, who regarded ‘thirst for power’ as the sole driving force of all human actions, has many a one-liners to his credit. ‘Woman was God’s second mistake’, he declared. Unmindful of the reactionary scathing criticism and shrill abuses he invited for himself, especially from the ever-irritable feminist brigade. The fact and belief that God never ever commits a mistake, brings Nietzsche’s proclamation dashingly down into the dust bin