Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

987 Words4 Pages
“...that [men] are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” (Declaration Of Independence). The Declaration of Independence tells us that men are born with the right to live their life as they so choose, with all the freedoms of speech, religion, and choice, and to be able to explore these freedoms in the search of being happy. These themes are all explored in “Harrison Bergeron”, a story by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. In the society Vonnegut creates, all men are totally and completely equal in that everyone is given handicaps to bring them down to the base means. Truly, our society would find this not only incredibly boring with the variety of man taken away, but barbaric…show more content…
While we would see this as an outrage, Harrison’s society decided that all men must be equal, and those who are born with above average talents were forced to be handicapped. Going against this made you dangerous and worthy of being taken away until you learned that everyone was, and had to be, equal. These laws even applied to children such as Harrison, who could not yet fully understand what society’s laws and repercussions meant. Harrison may have looked like a grown man at seven feet tall and devilishly handsome, but did not have the emotional maturity as we see in “”I am the Emperor!” cried Harrison. “Do you hear? I am the Emperor! Everyone must do what I say at once!”’ (Harrison Bergeron). When we examine these words from a rational adult’s point of view, they are clearly the words of a petulant child who wants attention. In this excerpt, Harrison’s behavior is comparable to a child in a schoolyard who has just climbed to the top of a hill, and pushed everyone out of the way to do so. No adult would demand everyone listen to them, that they are the Emperor, without actually having any control over the group they are addressing. This behavior is typical of a spoiled child, but a child none the less, and therefore it is unreasonable that Harrison should be held to an adult’s standards in a court of law. All these factors took…show more content…
During this whole situation, Harrison’s parents are watching from their TV at home. Harrison’s father, an extremely smart man, wears a device on his ear that makes a loud noise every 20 seconds to disrupt his thoughts. He wears a bag of birdshot on his shoulders to make him only as strong as everyone else. Harrison’s mother, on the other hand, is perfectly average in every way, and can’t keep a thought in her head for more than a minute as is, no handicap needed. As the Bergeron parents watch their son forcibly take over a TV station and subsequently be shot dead, Harrison’s mother begins to cry. Harrison’s father, who could not keep a thought in his head long enough to cry, goes into a kitchen for a beer and comes out to see his wife crying. He asks her what she was crying about and she replies with “I forget, [...] Something real sad on television” (Harrison Bergeron). To anyone in our society, seeing your son murdered live on TV would be a traumatic and unforgettable event, but the Bergeron parents forget it as quickly as it happens. This takes away both Harrison, and everyone else's, right to life. Harrison’s right to life is taken away in a more explicit sense, but his death being almost commonplace shows a subtle lack of the right to life for everyone else.
Open Document