Howard Zinn Interpretation And Eric Foner Perspective
433 Words2 Pages
The gilded age was focused on the lives of average individual during this era took place. During the nineteenth century in a time during reconstruction, many people have different stories about the gilded age and the true definition of what it means. This era was during the time the world was making a transformation in the economy. Howard’s Zinn interpretation and Eric Foner perspective was different then many others, majority of the people that thought neutral and single minded rather then what the world needed to hear. Zinn’s perspective was the blunt truth! Many times the gilded age or any historical event that occurred in the past time tended to leave out everything that the public wanted and needed to hear. Summarizing the truth wasn’t in the equation. Zinn’s approach wasn’t something you couldn’t disagree with only if you lived in denial and refuse to hear the truth. Information about the gilded age was left untold was resolved by individuals like Howard Zinn and many other inspirational icons during they’re time.…show more content… For example Zinn’s interpretation wasn’t directed by race or gender. Things that weren’t misled by things the he wasn’t people to believe but by the things people needed to hear about our country. In the book A People's History of the United States, Howard Zinn, stats that during the gilded age things was related to complexities of class and racial conflict. This meaning was based out of what society thought about you while many others having problem based on