Corporate Governance Case Study

1359 Words6 Pages
16MBA 1003 SINDHURA.K OECD PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE GOVERNENCE: COMPANIES BENEFITTED BY FOLLOWING OECD PRINCIPLES/ COMPANIES AFFECTED BY NOT FOLLOWING OECD PRINCIPLES INTRODUCTION: The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an intergovernmental economic organization with 35 member countries, founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade. It is a forum of countries describing themselves as committed to democracy and the market economy, providing a platform to compare policy experiences, seeking answers to common problems, identify good practices and coordinate domestic and international policies of its members. OECD PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE GOVERNENCE: The OECD Principles of Corporate Governance were…show more content…
The effort has been applauded and they are awarded the 8th Indonesian Institute Corporate Directorship Corporate Governance for their execution of disclosure and transparency principles in their governance. Miranti Hadisusilo, Matahari Department Store corporate secretary and legal director had the privilege of receiving the award from Indonesian Institute Corporate Directorship (IICD) management board member Endang Hoyaranda. In his address during the award ceremony he assured “"Matahari will continue to strengthen the trust of its investors through information disclosure and transparency in operations," The address conveyed strongly how the principle of governance – disclosure and transparency has a direct impact on the trust of investors. In addition the department store was in top 20 among the companies which had strong governance. He also added that with increase of public share ownership more than 80 percent Matahari kept enhancing the implementation of GCG which provides accurate information to the stake…show more content…
It was only a draft which required the thoughts of the board members. However the spoke person of Tata Sons denied that the note did not capture the agenda of the meeting. The repercussion took great toll on the trust of stakeholders and shareholders. The image of the company collapsed. The Companies image and reputation has direct impact on the stake holder support .The reputation of the company is the strategic resource for stake holders support. However it is documented and observed that many companies fail to implement appropriate assessment and control techniques to maintain the high level of the strategic resource. KENYA AIRWAYS: In the recent days Kenya airways has been experiencing reputational risk as the customers and stakeholders did not like what they see and hear about the company. In general any company faces significant reputational risks if the customers and stake holders are not kept informed in the right way. Kenya Airways has landed up losing the confidence of interested parties and customers to rival firm. Inaddition it has attracted increased scrutiny from government agencies and
Open Document