Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics On Courage

1228 Words5 Pages
In Nicomachean Ethics on courage, Aristotle present his argument that suggests no matter the circumstance, humans are fearful and fear evils, and by acting in accordance to whatever it is being faced, the end is the determinant of being virtuous. By implying courage as an intermediate between two vices of rashness and cowardice, Aristotle argues that while considering the feelings of fear and confidence, there should lay a mean of acting in a way that considers the action right in opposing evils and achieving the noble goal. Aristotle defines the virtue of courage in a manner that balances many emotions in which are needed for an action. He describes courage as an intermediate between two extremes of rashness and cowardice, and emphasizes…show more content…
First, he considers those who are facing their fears to win honor because of laws and the condemnations that would incur if they chose not to front these dangers. He ranks the subordinate person who has no say in their own actions, yet acts in a way that avoids disgrace and faces fear and pain for the desire of achieving the noble goal of honor. He thinks by acting for honors sake is brave, but what encourages the action out of passion is the most natural form of courage. He also considers the actions of the ones who act with vengeance and the ones who are hopeful because of their confidence in past endeavors are not equivalent to a brave man, but something affiliated to courage. Those who act without knowledge and in less preparation in accordance with their state of character are thought to be…show more content…
Aristotle believed it was sometimes right to fear things, such as disgrace, but it is shameless not to. He also believed that a man is brave and courageous when he faces and fears the right things, with the right motives and with confidence and acts in accordance to a noble end. While Ali may not have be considered someone consumed with fear, his actions present himself as not wanting to fail, and is easily assumable that he feared disgrace. Though, he did not want to let down the meaning of his new Islamic name, which meant beloved of God, a free man. He was willing to die for his rejection of the draft because of his strong beliefs against the Vietnam War and the racial oppression that was apparent during that time, and he was not going to be condemned or disgraced in the sake of his religion, his name, and speaking out against injustice because of the noble end he was speaking out
Open Document