Wrench LLC V. Taco Bell Corporation

529 Words3 Pages
The doctrine of implied-in-fact contract as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court , is a contract that is agreed upon by non-verbal actions as opposed to words, as well as providing a contractual agreement between parties based on and inferred from their conduct (Court, 1923). An example of this would be, if a person requests a taxi or car service, their actions indicate that they are willing to pay for a trip to a destination. In return, the driver of the vehicles actions would indicate that they are going to drive the passenger to their destination in exchange for financial compensation. Failure to comply with the implied actions from either party would result in a breach of implied-in-fact contract. The driver will not receive payment if they did not complete their implied actions and the passenger will not get driven anywhere or may receive possible legal action for failure to pay for services rendered.…show more content…
Taco Bell Corporation. Upon review of the case, Taco Bell did in fact act unethically. They used concepts that Wrench LLC brought to their respective meetings, and rough ideas for a commercial that was created within the guidelines that Taco Bell recommended, and stole the concept as well as the Psycho Chihuahua character for personal gain. They utilized another company to create and finish the commercial using these materials. Taco Bell enlisted the services of a company by the name of Chiat/Day, who also did not act ethically. According to the case, Chiat/Day received all the materials from Wrench LLC, and a couple of months later proposed using a real Chihuahua in the commercial and stated that these ideas for this were conceived all their

    More about Wrench LLC V. Taco Bell Corporation

      Open Document