One flaw in his argument is that there is a Sweeping Generalization in it. Robert Taylor is using one example throughout the whole article, Edward Snowden and the NSA. There are instances where he created hypothetical situations to support his claim, but does not mention any other case besides Edward Snowden’s. Every case or scenario is different; it all depends on factors such as the whistleblower’s position in the company, or the company’s reputation itself. If he had mentioned another whistleblowing
When it comes to government information and service projects the government’s knowledge of you is power over you. Surveillance from the government will sometimes catch a few criminals but it more often incriminates and imprisons people who are not guilty of anything. Government surveillance skyrocketed to a level it never needed to reach. With government projects like project prism the objectives are to obtain as much information as possible. Some of the things these projects do are aggregate U.S
in a Laura Poitras’s documentary film, Citizenfour4. My arguments are not based on specific permission details, or any court case between the copyright owners and Laura Poitras. My views rely on section 107 of US copyrights law7, which defines a four-factor test for fair use. In addition to using the four-factor test, my arguments draw on best practices in fair use. 1.1 Potential Fact Situation Citizenfour discusses the life of exiled Edward Snowden, who disclosed confidential information from the