Journal Writing 2 While reading the thinking routine to reflect on “the singer solution to world poverty” by peter singer, I miss my cousin sister. I miss her because we always argue while it is time to go out for dinner and going to shopping in mall. She has different point of view and I have different but we are best friend rather than cousin sister. Last April at the time of earthquake in Nepal, I quit my job and only I was going to college. I have only $200 to donate and need to buy one pants
end of the spectrum who cannot afford basic human needs. Peter Singer introduces this concept in terms of absolute affluence and absolute poverty. In his essay ‘Rich and Poor,’ Singer makes the argument that we have an obligation to assist those who are hungry. The use of the word “obligation” in his argument makes it seem like Singer is coming from a deontological standpoint. There is implication that we have a duty to help. However, Singer proves his instance of consequentialism by showing that
In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer, a bioethics professor, calls attentions for the urgent need for food and medicine by arguing, prosperous people should donate all money, not needed for the basic necessities of life, to overseas aid organizations. Peter Singer claims that “The formula is simple,” stating “whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Within his argument he supplies many pros and cons, however some are not as persuasive
Utilitarianism Generally, people in the world are categorized into two: the good and the bad. People's morality are usually measured with how they act based on their intentions, decide based on how it would benefit them, and act either in a proper or improper way. That is why, various scholars from different generations have created concepts with regard morality. One of these concepts is utilitarianism. In line with this assertion, this paper will attempt to explain the theory of act - utilitarianism
America is a country known the world over as one of the most affluent places to have ever existed. We are known to regularly purchase expensive frivolities: that humongous television, Mercedes-Benz’s, the list just goes on and on. In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the argument is made against this affluence and for Americans to donate every possible cent to making the world a better place. To make this argument more poignant Singer presents a pair of analogies: “the Brazilian
else luxury as they see fit. Peter Singer, who is the author of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” insists that every one of these wealthy Americans and all of the others, who have the means to do so, should be donating their surplus money to those in need. Considering that Singer is unable to force his readers to donate their money, he alternatively manipulates them by creating two hypothetical scenarios where he aims to not only support, but also find a solution to his argument. Furthermore
the shelters. And there comes an article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” from Peter Singer criticizing people who do not give cash donations to either charitable agencies or directly to the needy as immoral. In his writing, Singer states that the money people are spending luxuries should be donated to help sick children and low-income folks. In this paper, the author is going to argue that no one is obliged to financially support
In his article The Singer Solution to World Poverty, Peter Singer offers solution to World poverty and outlines a protocol to follow when giving to Charity, and emphasizes that money spent “on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” ( ) Researchers continue to argue about the moral obligation, and how much can be donated to help the less fortunate. In her article Aid Organizations Should Not Compete for Assistance Dollars, Saundra Schimmelpfenning acknowledges this by writing, “Charitable
While individuals are spending thousands on luxury goods without a worry, abject poverty is consuming millions of innocent lives. Peter Singer addresses the issue of poverty through the aspect of what is morally correct. Singer utilizes the situation in East Bengal as a basis for his argument where people are lacking food, medical care, and shelter resulting in unbearable suffering and death. He explains that it is not beyond the ability of richer nations to provide for those suffering; we just haven’t
responded by saying “our country gives a lot of free food to kids.” I then told her that a lot of countries in this world have the same issue. At that moment her facial expression turned somber. I can only imagine she used empathy be to put herself in the same situation as the kids asking for money. She proceeded to ask if there was anything she could do to help. If we truly want to make the world a better place for poor and homeless kids, we will need to utilize empathy in our lives. Start caring more,