The Plan Of San Luis Potosi Analysis

719 Words3 Pages
The Plan of San Luis Potosi describe the cruelty of the Mexican people and how president General Porfirio Diaz made the people of the nation suffer intolerable act. They were not accustomed to suffer violent among others. However, when President Diaz was ruling the nation he made it his adjective to make sure that only he can have full access to power. He was willing to go through any cost to stay as President and command everyone around him. As the dictator of the legislative and judicial he made sure that only his men were gained position of power. The election that was made define the evilness of General Porfirio Diaz because he evoke position of government from any person whom he thought would go against him.Therefore no one could turn…show more content…
Therefore it is hard to say whether the whole truly is being told. In the begin of the document the author kept using the word tyranny which made read wonder who was it. But the question is whether or not if the tyrant is not the person telling the story. For all that is mention one can assume that the unknown person in the story could have been part of President Diaz friends who didn’t gain all the opportunity to become the president instead of Mr.Ramon. There are a lot of question that can be asked to gain more information. For the writer never told the reader how was this new president was going to change the Mexican style of living. The author keep making the same statement “ I would have been President if the election was not illegal.” ( Madero,2) For the great chain of being in this paper does have mobility but only for the rich. The dictator controlled the everything and gave the punishment as necessary. Which can only means that the unknown person was part of the government but didn’t have a chance of being president because President Diaz did not elect him. This can lead to evoke of him trying to push the people to fight for their rights but keeping in mind that he helped them and should become the next…show more content…
Such as how would this new president change the suffering that the Mexican people going through. It has yet to ensure people how will this new ruler fight for liberty and justice. That the great charter expectation are meant.Indeed the reader knows about President Diaz and how bad he was as a president but what make this new candidate any better. To conclude President General Porfirio Diaz had 36 years of dictatorship of the Mexican people. He failed as a president and greed took over him. For it was the people that elected him but he has made decision that has brought suffering among the people. while controlling Mr. Ramon Corral his point men he has also brought many emeny. He has used full force to the Mexican people when they try to remove him from power. With all this in mind one can only judge the situation based on one person point of view. So is this new leader any better or worse than president Diaz since it can be said that the tyranny is the same person that might be working for General Porfirio
Show More
Related

  • Mexican Revolution Research Paper

    1827 Words  | 8 Pages

    Huerta. Initially, Huerta was fully supportive of Maderos progressive attitude but slowly lost his respect as his presidency went on. Huerta, along with Mexican Politicians Felix Diaz, Bernardo Reyes, and U.S. ambassador Henry Lane Wilson had devised a plan to assassinate Madero. Madero was assassinated on February 13th, 1913. After Madero’s assassination, Huerta became the president of Mexico. This was largely in part to U.S. intervention which installed him as president. Huertas dictatorship caused

    Read More

More about The Plan Of San Luis Potosi Analysis

Open Document