Slavery: Was John Brown A Good Man?

562 Words3 Pages
John Brown was a white American abolitionist who believed armed revolution was the only way to overthrow the foundation of slavery. Brown’s father hated slavery as well and his father’s hate is what also influenced Brown to be antislavery. As Brown was growing up he observed mistreatment of slaves throughout the years. At the age of thirty seven Brown many a vow into ending slavery and that when it all begun, but did this make him a good man? In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed which allowed the new settlers of the territories to decide whether they accepted slavery within their boundaries. Nebraska quickly joined the union and was anti slavery while Kansas had problems because there were abolitionist that moved there to prevent another state from becoming a “slave” state. During this time Kansas became the “Bleeding Kansas.” Later John Brown goes to Kansas and directs his men to murder five proslavery settlers. Stephen B. Oates. Harper and Row add to the argument when they write, “....Brown did not commit any of the actual murders himself, but he was their leader and made the decisions as to who should be killed and who was to be spared”, (Stephen B. Oates. Harper and Row). Basically, Stephen B. Oates. Harper…show more content…
On whether he was doing right with his operation. Most argued that just because Brown was anti slavery that didn’t give him the right to do or demand any killing to be done. According to Peggy A. Russo and Paul Finkelman, “John Brown was brave, committed, and unalterably opposed to slavery. But he was also violent. He killed men- or ordered them killed-...”, (Peggy A. Russo and Paul Finkelman). Peggy A. Russo and Paul Finkelman are insisting that even though Brown was a fearless and devote to wanting all states free this didn’t give him the right to kill anyone. Brown was unfair for committing this crimes. John Brown, himself was giving himself his own name which was a
Open Document