Trial: Plea Bargaining One of the most conventional and contentious issues discussed in the Canadian legal system is plea bargaining. Its definition varied over the years as people scrutinized every aspect of this matter. The Law Reform Commission of Canada defined it as “any agreement by the accused to plead guilty in return for the prosecutor’s agreeing to take or refrain from taking a particular course of action”. (Plea Discussions and Agreements, p. 66) This given definition of plea bargaining
Plea Bargaining In today’s criminal justice system plea bargaining is a very long standing and effective choice in sentencing for both the defendant and the issuing prosecutor. Plea bargains are an arranged agreement or settlement between a defendant and a prosecutor in which the defendant is forced to plead guilty for the crimes they are being charged or accused for in exchange for either shorter sentencing or some other form of less harsh punishment. This seems to be a huge bonus for the defendant
shortest meaning of the Plea Bargain. In a traditional and a broad sense, it can be said that “plea bargaining” actually refers to pre-trial negotiations, usually conducted by counsel and prosecution, during which defendant gets agreed to plead guilty with exchange for some concessions by prosecutor. Plea Bargaining is result of modern kind of judicial thinking. Most of the legal experts described it as some lazy form of prosecution which results in undue leniency to offenders. Plea bargain is basically