Section 1 In this section of the paper I will focus on Peter Singer’s argument for the claim that we should radically change our standard practices when it comes to food production involving sentient animals. Backing for this claim comes from his belief that like humans, some non-human animals have similar interests and sentience (PowerPoint). Singer’s definition of sentience is the ability to experience pain and pleasure and it is essential for being able to have interests (PowerPoint). We have
Peter Singer first presented the replaceability argument in the X chapter of Practical Ethics, when assessing the morality of killing. Is it possible to assess the wrongness of killing in utilitarian terms? Leaving aside indirect reasons (such as the grief of fear of others), a utilitarian could argue that killing someone negatively impacts on their well-being. Thus, first, it is necessary to determine whether the victim has been harmed by their death. In other words, it is imperative to address
this compared to deontology; this topic has had philosophers arguing for decades about what ethical morals one believes to be correct in their beliefs. Both arguments have justified pros and cons, depending on your perspective; you may make this topic and choose a side. I am quite fond of the idea of deontology mainly because of their arguments are more justified, in which I believe them to have great points on Aristotle’s the good life. This topic will be covered throughout this essay and how both
Utilitarianism was the most important component of philosophic radicalism. It was opposed to tradition and to theories of natural law, and in addition it was implicitly critical of religion. It served to undermine the legitimacy of the established regime. One of the major components of philosophic radicalism was political economy. The principles of political economy were incompatible with monopoly and protectionism. Another component of philosophic radicalism was its rationale for democracy. The
Erickson believed that each developmental stage brought its own challenges and he refers to them as crises. Erikson also believed that these crises of the ego present challenges to one’s individual identity. Successful development of the personality (or psychosocial development) depends on meeting and overcoming these tasks or crises (Fleming, 2004, p. 9-4). Every obstacle in life is an opportunity to grow. I believe, as I look back and remember my childhood and adulthood, all the things I have
Consequentialism is a philosophical theory which centres on leaving the world, or state of affairs, in the best state possible. This theory embodies the saying, “the ends justify the means,” placing additional emphasis on the end rather than the means. Consequentialists believe that a person should not worry about the actions, which they must partake in as long as the consequences of those actions lead to the best possible outcome available to them. The theory does not stop at individual actions
Deriving from the Latin term utilitas, which means usefulness, utility, advantage, or profit, Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory in normative ethics. It argues that in light of the impossibility of objectively defining Good and Evil, one ought to behave and act based on the resulting well-being, which defines the rightness or wrongness of an action. It thus dismissing the concept of duty as the determinant of morality, the quality of an action being determined by its consequences. Whatever
In considering utilitarian literature, two forms of utilitarianism have emerged in the mid-20th century: act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. These two forms of utilitarianism are often contrasted due to the difference in their application of the greatest happiness principle which states that "an act is right insofar as it produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people" (Elements 72)." • Firstly, act-utilitarianism applies the principle directly on a particular action
Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a type of theory that deals with the results alone to determine what is good. Utilitarianism was formulated by Jeremy Bentham, and later on Mill who also agreed on Bentham’s principle of Utilitarianism. Bentham’s principle “Greatest Enjoyment Principle: Maximize the pleasure for the greatest number of people. Such examples include torturing someone to save lives of many. Bentham’s quantify pleasure is based on examples such as intensity, fruitfulness, duration, and
“I joined the army to avenge the deaths of my family and to survive, but I've come to learn that if I am going to take revenge, in that process I will kill another person whose family will want revenge; then revenge and revenge and revenge will never come to an end…” A young boy, Ishmael Beah, who was forced to become a child soldier in Sierra Leone at age thirteen, said this. The novel, A Long Way Gone: Memories of A Boy Solider focuses on Ishmael Beah’s journey from an innocent twelve year old