Morality In The Canterbury Tales

1361 Words6 Pages
Nhattien Nguyen Ms. Haggerty Senior English 9 April 2015 Moral Analysis of the Canterbury Tales Temptation is an invisible hand that guides humanity towards its own demise. It lures people in by disguising its fangs and claws as their wants and needs. Many religions urged its followers to resist their temptations because they drive them to act uncontrollably and harm others. In the Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, three lovers chase after one girl they use evil tricks on each other and end up suffering from their actions. Human ethics are questioned as many opposite forces face each other in this short tale. The idea of free choice seems nonexistent as the characters act blindly, driven by their desires and not reason. The Miller’s…show more content…
To start with, the Miller’s Tale have no sense of morality because it was meant to be a comedy about adultery. Since this tale was supposed to mock the Knight’s Tale there was no possible reason for the characters to have the same morals. The other participants even urged the Miller to not tell his story because he was so intoxicated. In the first scene with Nicholas and Alison Chaucer stated, “But then for mercy he made such a plea and spoke so fairly, offering so fast his all to her, that she agreed at last to grant him her love.” (Chaucer 3288). This quote means that both Nicholas and Alison have sinned. In this small conversation they agreed to break two of the Ten Commandments. Nicholas obviously used his clever tricks to seduce Alison if she was unimpressed with the two other men. They both committed adultery broke another Commandment by robbing John of Alison’s love. They even took things further to ruin John’s reputation for a night together. One of the terrible things the tale promotes to its audience is stealing. It is completely…show more content…
One bad habit that people tend to do is lie. Chaucer uses the opening scene to foreshadow Nicholas’s wrongful use of his power over others. When introducing Nicholas, Chaucer added, “To answer well when asked about conditions such as when men would ask in certain hours if they would be expecting drought or showers” (Chaucer 3194). This quote means to say that Nicholas was a very important and credible source at Oxford. There were very few people who could forecast the weather so he automatically has the trust of those around him. To spend more time together, the young lovers decided to trick John. Nicholas went immediately for the religious approach of Noah’s Ark after seeing John pray for his well-being. He also knows that John cares for Alison more than his own life and convinces him to save his wife before it is too late. Furthermore, the time period of when the work was created could heavily influence the way it was written. To find the reason why the characters act the way they do it is best to use character analysis. Chaucer compares many of his characters to animals within the Miller’s Tale. In one analysis the author stated, “Chaucer’s description associates the Miller with both a ‘sowe’ and a ‘fox’ animals commonly considered to be filthy and sly (Kaai 2). Every main character in the tale resembles either one or both of the
Open Document