Michel de Montaigne wrote his essays during the French Renaissance, in Bordeaux. As one of the most notable philosophers of the French Renaissance, Montaigne’s nonchalant style has allowed his essays to pass the test of time, and still be exoteric hundreds of years later. His lack of ignorance increases the validity of his statements. His essays have a delicate balance of general knowledge intertwined with personal opinions on different topics and ideas, making the essay approachable and relatable.
Cathy Caruth once said ‘The traumatized, we might say, carry an impossible history within them or they become themselves the symptom of a history that they cannot entirely possess.’ It is true that fictional narratives are not always derived from the personal views or experiences of the author who is writing them. But at times, they can perfectly capture trauma so convincingly that we are almost convinced they are drawing off of first-hand experience. Cathy Caruth, a trauma theorist, has summated
Everyone has struggled to meet expectations in school at some point in their lives, although there are students that push their limits because of impossible ideals set by the American school systems and colleges. In “Doing School”: How We Are Creating a Generation of Stressed Out, Materialistic and Miseducated Students, the author Denise Clark Pope poses the questions, “What can schools do in light of the constraints of college admission requirements and national education policies that spur competition
In Diane Sommerville's essay, “A Burden Too Heavy to Bear”, she talks about the traumatic events and suicide in soldiers and physicians during and after the war. She mentions that “during World War II thousands of recruits suffered 'fear reactions'...Confederate soldiers who committed
Normative determinations differ from scientific determinations in that they follow a procedure. Returning to the matter of stealing cake, Jack could acknowledge that rather than stealing from Tom, he has other choices in accordance with moral law. While he may realize that in accordance with causal law he will ultimately face the effect of his theft, only via a normative determination will he experience practical freedom. In this Critique, Kant’s main purpose is not to draw the reader’s attention
Kant to focus less on theoretical obscurity and more upon practical issues and leads to the notion of good will which Kant explains at the outset of Section I in Groundwork: It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will (Gr. 4:393) Good will includes several features: it is neither merely designed to make us happy, nor does it rely on the consequences of an act or unconditional good. While