An Ethical Analysis of Man’s Inhumanity to Man in the Colonial Era (Prior to 1776)
“Man’s inhumanity to man makes countless thousands mourn!” Throughout history the inhumanity of man to man has been one of the most recurring themes this world has ever experienced. It has made its appearance in every era and every place, and every form. Racism, torture, and murder are all examples of the kinds of unjust inhumanities that have existed in our world, and although it has not always been shown to the same degree of cruelty, it has still always been present in some form or another. The Colonial Era was no exception. The inhumanity of man by man in this era was devastatingly apparent; one particular instance that was especially egregious was the…show more content… To show the cruelty of these letters and of this concept, the using of the disease Smallpox is unfortunately not the only horrible act discussed in these letters; they also talk about the use of dogs to hunt the indians, an act used so commonly it was referred to as the “Spaniard’s Method.” As a reply to Amhersts approvals, Bouquet writes a letter dated 26 July 1763, saying, “all your Directions will be…show more content… The letters were filled with comments that clearly indicate a genocidal intent, with phrases such as: “...that Vermine … have forfeited all claim to the right of humanity” (Bouquet to Amherst, 25 June.) “I would rather chuse the liberty to kill any Savage that may come in our way, than to be perpetualy doubtful whether they are Friends or Foe.” (Bouquet to Amherst, 25 June, 1763.) “...Measures to be taken as would Bring about the Total Extirpation of those Indian Nations.” (Amherst to Sir William Johnson, Superintendent of the Northern Indian Department, 9 July.) “...their Total Extirpation is scarce sufficient Attonement…” (Amherst to George Croghan, Deputy Agent for Indian Affairs, 7 August, 1763.) “...in the end will put a most Effectual Stop to their very Being.” (Amherst to Johnson, 27 August; emphasis in original.) Amherst’s correspondence during this time mainly included many letters on routine matters for someone in his position, such as officers who were sick or wanted to be relieved of duty; accounts of supplies on hand, cost for the supplies, numbers of people garrisoned; and so on. None of those letters hinted at a disturbed mind or an obsession with cruelty. His hatred was exclusively reserved just for the