Shakespeare’s notable play Henry V is centred on the overlying concept of war and national conflict, but its intention is to reveal how humans react when placed under the pressures of war. This is visibly evident King Henry’s transformation from a clueless leader to a motivational mastermind and how good leadership qualities don’t really define a good person. This essay will examine three prominent speeches that display this revelation and focus on how it has affected Henry as individual. The visionary
The terms of “good” and “evil” have been defined in different ways by a good number of sources. According to the Oxford Dictionary “good” means “having the required qualities, of a high standard; possessing or displaying moral virtue” and “evil” means “profoundly immoral and wicked.” What might at first seem like a clear opposition between the two concepts becomes extra complex after a thorough study. The dichotomy between good and evil has been heavily discussed by critics, whether a clear divide
difference in the hands of Manjeri Isvaran, G.V. Desani, Lakhan Deb and Pritish Nandy.” Manjeri Isvaran’s Yama and Yami (1948) is a dialogue in poetic prose, with a prologue and an epilogue, dealing with the incestuous love of Yami for her brother. G. V. Desani’s Hali (1950), an entirely different kind of play, received high praise for its originality, symbolism and rich imagery. Lakhan Deb’s Tiger Claw (1967) is a historical play in three acts on the controversial murder of Afzal Khan by Shivaji. His