Compare And Contrast Zoroastrianism And Confucianism
523 Words3 Pages
Zoroastrianism, Confucianism, and Legalism provided support and structure to their respective societies.
Zoroastrianism first emerged in the Persian Empire. Followers of Zoroastrianism believed in Ahura Mazda, a benevolent god and the creator of good things, and Angra Mainyu, a destructive and evil spirit; an honest and good life would lead believers to a heavenly paradise while an evil existence would result in pain and suffering. Zoroastrianism promoted a life of strong morals and enjoying life in moderation.
As Zoroastrianism rose in popularity the emperors of the Achaemenid era began to claim that Ahura Mazda appointed them as rulers. By identifying themselves as being selected by Ahura Mazda, emperors experienced elevated esteem and reverence from those they ruled over. Emperors were able to accomplish much and utilize a centralized government because loyal followers of Zoroastrianism would honor the emperor as their god’s chosen representative. Even though…show more content… Prior to the implementation of Legalism, China was at war within itself. Legalist doctrine employed swift and severe punishment for infractions, even minor ones. Family members and neighbors were called on to police one other and report law breakers; efforts to protect law breakers would result in punishment for entire families or communities. Legalism instilled fear in the hearts of the people as a method of control.
The Qin dynasty was the first to unify China via Legalism. Qin rulers were also able to establish a centralized government because of the presence of loyal officials and a fearful society. A centralized government enabled implementation of a uniformed monetary system, writing system, and legal system. Legalism assisted in the unification of China, but ultimately caused the end of the Qin dynasty. After the emperor’s death, rebels revolted and murdered many Qin officials due to the ruthlessness of the dynasty’s