Arguments Against The Use Of Waterboarding Machiavelli
531 Words3 Pages
Water boarding was been long ago. In 1500s during Italian investigation used waterboarding for prisoner and it was move to a lot of countries. In 2009, President Barack Obama has banned the waterboarding in American. He believe waterboarding was tortured. It contains well-built someone down to a board, putting a cloth over their face and pouring water over them. It can hurt the lungs by suffering from oxygen scarcity, dry drowning, and amongst other things.
Machiavelli was 16th century Italian political philosopher, was commonly related with a lack of principles in politics. Machiavelli actually debated is that small scruples must not be allowed to interfere with accomplishing greater goods. He believe that a political leader must be willing to dirty his hands to do what needs to be done. Machiavelli would have completely supported the use of waterboarding. He wanted the truth to come out by any means required. He wanted the truth to be carried in the way it really was. Machiavelli has become widely regarded as a scheming, deceptive and unethical. All the work and word he use was to support the waterboarding.…show more content… He thought that a political leader must be willing to dirty his hands to do what needs to be done. But I believe sometime dirty always remember as dirty and it will never clean as much as try. All political leader don’t want favor for their country and people. They wants their willing and goodness in own their life. I believe it not a good to have play a dirty game as leader of country. It their responsibilities to teach the good things, share love, affection, mutual understanding, and great combinational with other countries. If leader show the right path then it definitely turn everything’s in willing of humanities goodness and country will run with smoothly and effectively collaboration with