Big game hunting produces enormous profits, as well as ominous atrocities. In the United States, hunting has deep origins, dating back many centuries. However, typically hunting in America has always been largely related to the killing of wildlife for food consumption. Americans, as a whole, tend to not tolerate the killing of innocent wildlife for mirely sport or exhibition. Some people believe there is an immoral component to big game hunting in addition to an unlawful, and unjustified profitability aspects of this sport. Furthermore, statistics show that there has been a steady decline in the population of big game animals over the last century, thus making them vulnerable to extinction.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, big game…show more content… “For sport, [big game hunting] is immoral no matter what the supposed benefits, and that safaris and wildlife preserves could generate profitable tourism without allowing hunting.” In addition, it is not necessary to encourage the murder of majestic animals to supply conservation efforts, citing the productive safari tourism industry (“Should Big Game Hunting Be Legal”). Furthermore, renowned professional Namibian hunter, Kai-Uwe Denker, stated, “I see a very big danger in promoting only the financial side. Livelihoods, income generation, job creation... You cannot justify immoral things with money” (“Should We Kill Animals to Save Them?”). This immoral act can evidently not be justified, as stated before. The disadvantages of big game hunting that Americans participate in heavily outweigh the benefits they prosper from. Not only do Americans find enjoyment in hurting these animals, but the big game hunting industry has become tremendously too large and profitability aspects seen too captivating, only condoning the the safari hunts to…show more content… For example, “In some regions, hunting is vital for conservation. In such regions, "it pays it stays" works and a ban would be detrimental to wildlife” (“Viewpoint: Uncomfortable Realities of Big Game Hunting”). Additionally, hunting accomplishes the revenue and job productions, improving knowledge about wildlife conditions, and encourages contributions to habitats. Banning big game hunting will be dentermentional to conservation efforts (“Should Big Game Hunting Be Legal?”). Finally, “If a certain number of animals are not hunted, there will be too many animals belonging to a given species for a given environment to support. The environment will then suffer through overgrazing, and the animals will die of starvation and disease” (35). Although conversation efforts are being followed and improved on with such actions, Americans are unaware of the population destruction occurring among these species. “These organizations use a ranking system to classify each species' status, with such categories as extinct, extinct in the wild, critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, near threatened, and least concern. Of the "big five" trophy hunting targets, elephants and lions are "vulnerable," meaning significant population declines have been observed or inferred in recent years” (“Should Big Game Hunting Be Legal?”). With this dramatic