Abortion And Life Support: Article Analysis

703 Words3 Pages
The New York Times article, “Pregnant, and Forced to Stay on Life Support, exploited an accustomed ethical issue on January 7th, 2014. The health care ethical issues acknowledged in this article included abortion and life support. Marlise Munoz, a 33-year-old female, suffered a blood clot in her lungs, leaving her brain-dead. After hastening to a Texas intensive care unit, Munoz’ family valued their daughter’s wish not to depend on life support, and arranged for their goodbyes. Alongside the already heartbreaking condition, Munoz’ family acquired devastating news – the doctor would not respect their daughter’s wishes because of her pregnancy. Outraged at the news, the doctor explicated, “Texas is one of more than two dozen states that prohibit, with varying degrees of strictness, medical officials from cutting off life support to a…show more content…
At 14 weeks pregnant and brain-dead, not only is the hospital taking away the dignity and autonomy of the patient, but they’re also sanctioning a child to stand without a mother. While a patient attains a right to create personal selections about his or her life, this choice becomes distorted when another individual’s life rests directly influenced. Harmonizing on an ethical solution, to a health care issue, does not continuously emerge at ease, as it entails conflicting morals. The ethical principles that I did not perceive evidenced in the situation described in this article were beneficence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. When examining for beneficence and non-maleficence in the situation, I searched for evidence of actively doing what is superlative for the patient, by preventing harm and an agonizing life. In this situation, while the doctors did follow company polices, they did not deliver these ethical

More about Abortion And Life Support: Article Analysis

Open Document