Thomas Aquinas Arguments

1097 Words5 Pages
Many philosophers debate about the existence of God. It is difficult to answer the question whether or not God exist, because we have only discovered so much. If God exist, what type of God is it? These are some of the issues that come to mine when philosophers argue about the existence of God. When it comes to this, genuine philosophers should believe in a God. By using the arguments from Thomas Aquinas’ “Five Proofs” and William James’ “Will to Believe”, I will explain why philosophers must believe in God. In Thomas Aquinas’ “Five Ways”, he claims that he can proof for the existence of God. The first way he explains, is the effect of motion. For an object to have motion, it must be put in motion by an object that has motion. According to…show more content…
From this, he tries to describe that things just do not appear into existence, but rather put into existence; put into motion. The second way, similar to his first way, is that all things have an efficient cause of itself. He states that no object created or caused itself. This leads to Aquinas explaining that there must have been a first cause. A first cause has to exist for there to be a first effect and the first efficient cause is assumed to be God. The third way is that things need a necessary object to start their existence. Aquinas tells us that without an eternal being, everything would eventually cease to be, given infinite time. At a point in time he claims that nothing existed, which would have made it impossible for anything to exist. Accordingly, something must have had to exist of its own necessity and its existence did not come from another object, but rather causes them. This necessary cause is God. Aquinas’s fourth proof, is the gradation found in things.…show more content…
He explains that believing is rationally permissible even if that belief is not being based upon sufficient evidence. In his argument, he states that belief can be identified as hypothesis. These hypothesis can be characterized in three kinds of dilemmas: live, forced, and momentous. James defines them as “genuine” options, or choices. A live choice is opposition to a dead choice. It has internal and subjective appeal to the chooser. When it is really important or meaningful to a person that believes in it; a real possibility of belief is involved, then it is a live choice. A dead option has no emotive appeal to the chooser. Options that are very unlikely, impossible or uninteresting, are most likely dead options. Options that are forced, is when a choice must be made and there is no suspension of judgement. For example, the option to choose to live or die; you either choose to live or choose not to, there is not alternative. An unforced option is an avoidable option, in certain situations there are alternative choices to choose or the chooser can evade the issue by not making a choice. An option is momentous when something important depends on it. A momentous option is once in a life time situation that involve making a drastic change in one’s life. In contrast to this are trivial options, which have little effect or where the issue presents itself
Open Document