Richard Ryder's Painism And His Criticism Summary

1240 Words5 Pages
Ryder’s Painism and His Criticism of Utilitarianism In the article Ryder is a proponent of Painism and a he critiques utilitarianism. The article addresses how Richard Ryder started a movement of welfare towards animals and employs a specialism concept. In the wider realm, the article, Ryder’s Painism and His Criticism of Utilitarianism, is an examination of the critique of utilitarianism by Ryder. The authors Joost Leuven and Tatjana Visˇak also integrate the ideals of animal liberation by Peter Singer and animal rights by Tom Reagan, where they compare these predominant theories to the theory of Painism by Ryder. The view by Ryder regards the experimentation on animals and critiques the “sentience term” frequently used by Singer. The Painism…show more content…
By introducing the “speciesism” concept, Ryder made an important contribution to the movement’s current expansion. This movement provided a current contribution to the important expansion of the issue of animal rights (Singer 194). In the advent of harmonizing the rival animal ethics theories, Ryder’s pianism served as a movement whose aims were identified alongside those of the movements launched previously like the movements involving the black struggle, the plight of women, and the issue of homosexuals, and hence the movement initiated by the theory was a distinct paradigm from the movements whose agenda was animal concerns and welfare, since the advent of the 18th century (Joost &Tatjana 415). In a wider realm, Ryder’s Painism theory serves to harmonize the theories by Richard Dawkins and Singer Peter. The two major theorists, among other contributors necessitated the popularity of the term analogous to “racism” and “sexism” – “speciesism”. This term meant the moral unjustified discrimination, in the particular context of the species of the being (Reagan 17). The published work by Ryder was largely involved in the continuous discourse of the ethics surrounding animals, and it is unfortunate that through time his views regarding animal ethics were put on the sidelines, and even dominated debates which involved the two major rival theories…show more content…
The individual rights form the central focus of the laws set to protect humans in the advent of experimentation. Conversely, the laws covering animals focused necessarily on the avoidance of suffering – quantified in terms of pain that would discontinue the form of the involved animal- to the animals and not really their rights as with the human case. Ryder describes how the moral considerations on how animals should be handled during experimentation are based on utilitarian realms of costs and benefits, that is, the moral concerns on animals is based on the consideration and justification of the gains of the suffering to humans- if the suffering has a lesser cost than the benefits to humans that will be as a result, then it is justified(Joost &Tatjana 418). It is a logical argument by Ryder that utilitarian underlines the fact that the human rights under law are protected, while the rights of animals aren’t protected. The double standard promoted by utilitarianism forms a speciesism form. The introduction of the “Painism” term was therefore a positive contribution was a non-specialist approach in the effort to maintain the aspects which are worthwhile regarding the utilitarianism theory by Singer, and at the same time underlining the protection of individual rights

    More about Richard Ryder's Painism And His Criticism Summary

      Open Document