Gregory Doran’s Hamlet (2010) is a loyal interpretation of the play, meaning that it respects and adheres to the source material and previous productions, despite its modern setting and cinematic adaptation. It may be easy for some to write off the Doran film as a low-culture take on the Shakespeare play because of its choice of setting and medium. I believe this is not an equitable stance on the film. So by comparing the film with the text and other cinematic productions of Hamlet, such as the films
Hamlet vs. Hamlet When I chose to watch two versions of Hamlet by William Shakespeare I had no idea I would enjoy the notorious tragedy as much as I did. The pure art and skill put into both Benedict Cumberbatch’s Hamlet and the Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet astounded me. The two adaptations were beautiful yet traditional, and made a very known and recognized story feel fresh and new again. However, as tragically beautiful as the duo were there was one distinct difference that really separated the two
Based on Sir Thomas More’s History of Richard III, Shakespeare’s Richard III, on the one hand, reproduces Richard’s plots and wicked acts from the moral and ethical perspectives. On the other hand, however, Shakespeare introduced new dimension of the writing by overcoming the moral obstacle that was forced by the contemporary society, which was the Middle Ages Renaissance era. It is that this ‘murderer’, Richard, is presented more interesting and fascinating than any other virtuous and kindness protagonists
One of William Shakespeare’s most famous and perhaps most convoluted plays is Hamlet. In this tragedy, Hamlet, the main character, is mourning the unexpected death of his father, Old Hamlet. During this melancholy time in the kingdom, Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, marries her deceased husband’s brother, Claudius. Naturally, in Hamlet’s frazzled state of mind, chaos ensues. Both Kenneth Branagh and Franco Zeffirelli beautifully portrayed this pandemonium. Despite this one of these movies can be considered
Shakespeare’s Richard III explores the tension between providentialism and the uprising of free will, as a result of the renaissance, demonstrating Shakespeare’s engagement with political machinations of the state. The political instability within England, which resulted from War of the Roses, has been influential to Shakespeare's text. At the turn of the 15th century with the rise of humanism, Shakespeare responds to the shift in the political paradigms by portraying Richard as a tyrannical king
.. Part I and Part II). And here we will look at some screen interpretations of the Bard's chief historical histrionics. As per experts, Shakespeare's historical plays consists of ten works: King John, Richard II, Henry IV – Part I and Part II, Henry V, Henry VI – Part I, II and III, Richard III and Henry VIII. Of course he did not write them in the above order, but the sequence is chronological in that it
A New Spin on an Old Classic William Shakespeare's play Hamlet has grown to be one of the most studies fictional pieces in literature. Because of this fame, Hamlet has also made its way to the silver screen. Although the film renditions are based on the same play, each film offers its own artistic interpretation of the piece. Two of the most popular rendition of Hamlet are Franco Zeffirelli's Hamlet (1999) and Michael Almereyda (2000). Zeffirelli's adaptation of the piece is more similar to the
Mikaela Missouri 19 October 2014 AICE English Lit Richard III W.A. #3 Richard III by Shakespeare Ambition, Tyranny, and the Nature of Kingship The play, Richard III by Shakespeare tells the story of an evil, manipulative, and corrupt man who uses the power of language, political brilliancy, and intelligence to ultimately win the title of king of England. However, as it is apparent to the reader and several characters of the play, Richard is extremely undeserving of the position which brings upon
The Tragedy of Richard III I believe Richard III to be a malicious, envious and power hungry man. He may have been dealt an unfair hand with his facial deformity, but that still does not justify his mad actions. Richard Duke of Gloucester envisions himself being king one day and he is not bothered or disturbed in how he may go about this venture. His theory was " If I can not have a lover, I will become the villain."- Richard III He does as any other attention deprived sibling would do and that
How does Richard use his power to control, or try to control, other in Act 1 Scene 2? We see here, Lady Anne mourning over King Henry VI, her father-in-law, killed by Richard, and who has also slain her husband. Richard enters the stage, and using his gift of deception and false emotion to a great art, manages to win over Lady Anne, despite her extreme hatred towards him, as shown to us through her language. Lady Anne and her attendants are on stage mourning over the corpse of King Henry VI which