Occurrence At Owl-Creek Bridge Voice

662 Words3 Pages
A Comparison of Narrative Voices in “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” In the short story “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”, different types of narrative voices like the point-of-view is used in the writing. A story does not necessarily have to use only one type of point-of-view. “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” is a good example of using more than one type of point-of-view as it uses three different types of third-person point-of-views instead of only one throughout the whole story. The narrative voices does not only have to be the point-of-view. It can also be the reliability of a character, the narrator's degree of omniscience, or objectivity. For this story, the main focus of the narrative voices are the point-of-views and…show more content…
In this part of the story, it is told in the third-person omniscient point-of-view. You can tell because everyone's thought’s and locations are all known by the narrator. Like when the Union spy passes by the house, Farquhar did not see that happen so it was the omniscient narrator telling us that there was was a spy there. This is the most used point-of-view in stories since the effect is the greatest for the audience. The narrator can easily reveal anything about anyone without having to have that character speak about it. It is the easiest to write in and is a lot easier than any of the other point-of-views like first-person, second-person,…show more content…
It stays like this up until the very end where Farquhar flashes out of his illusion and is hanged in real life. The point-of-view used here is called third-person objective. You can tell that it is third-person objective because the narrator only talks about what is happening and nothing is mentioned about anybody’s thoughts. The effect of this point-of-view, is that it causes the story to be written with no thoughts from any characters so everything that you read is only about what is happening and not really about what the character’s personality is like. This forces the reader to guess about what the character is thinking unlike third-person omniscient and limited where we have some simple understanding of a character's
Open Document