Macro Social Work

1039 Words5 Pages
The practice of Macro Social Work is to help clients by focusing on the change in larger systems. “Macro Practice is a professionally guided intervention designed to bring about planned change in organizations and communities” (Netting, Kettner, McMurtry, & Thomas, 2012). This paper will describe the concept of personal, interpersonal, and political empowerment, explain individuals involvement in multiple social systems in the work environment, discuss the Macro System response to child maltreatment, crime, and delinquency, compare and contrast the application of functionalism and interactionist theory to poverty, and describe the roles and responsibility of the human service worker in the macro environment. Empowerment is a key term for understanding…show more content…
Physical, emotional, sexual and child neglect done by a parent, caregiver or any other person who harms the child’s development. The Macro system has designed a way to ensure the child’s safety and well-being. For example, calling the child’s school, youth services available in the community, and calling RAIN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Hotline). Macro system responses can be divided into three risks: mild, moderate, and severe. If the case is mild, responses that are suggested are early intervention, family support, formal/informal services, parent education and housing assistance. If the case is moderate, suggested responses are appropriate formal services, coordinated family support, safety plans, and community support services. For severe cases, suggested responses are intensive family protection, child removal, court-ordered services, foster care, adoption, or criminal prosecution (Human service interactions in terms of macro systems). In general both functionalism theory to poverty explains why social groups (rankings of people based on wealth and social values) exists and endures. Interactionist theory on the other hand symbolizes the differences these groups produce for…show more content…
Unlike the functionalist view, Interactionist do not explain why society is divided into “classes,” but furthermore examines the difference that social and monetary class makes in people’s social lifestyles and daily interactions. The Interactionist theory states, lower income people exist due to the incapacity to make sense of their lives. Lower income people may not have been fortunate enough to have been given opportunity or take advantage of opportunities presented. Additionally, lower income people may not have had the education, financial stability or moral support to further advance in their personal lives. Theoretically, lower income societies are at a greater risk of being victimized in the geographical area in which they reside in. Unfortunately, society may believe poverty exists due to people being raised in lower income geographical areas. Believing and settling for what their social environment has provided may discourage an individual to pursue a higher education, or desired career therefore not discovering there true determination to pursue a better life. However, despite the above theories, poverty is a great concern to all communities and Human Service
Open Document