Employee Engagement Theory

888 Words4 Pages
According Albrecht (2012), organization should encourage and keeps employees well-being that is one of the factors that contribute to their performance and commitment to achieve organizational goals and objectives. He argued that when employees provided with open and supportive clear autonomy to his background and career development will ensure engagement to his job clearly aligned with organizational goals. Others indicated, the various drivers of work engagement and the incremental benefits accrued to organizations dues to effective commitment practices are clearly interpreted. Studies shown that solution to employee engagement for MBSA performance is need to provide and sharing the ideas and feelings together also that manager and leaders…show more content…
The theory is that people make social decisions based on perceived cost and benefit. As per the theory said, they are two types of relationship at workplace such as economic relationship, and the relationship is shorten, and social exchange relationships that are related to close personal attachment and open-ended obligation. The logic behind employees, who are satisfied with their duty or job and like the work culture, the organization appreciate them, feels obliged and are always eager to give their best to the organization. According James et.al. (2011) supervisory support, recognition, employee satisfaction with the schedule, job clarity and career development are the predictors of employee engagement. According Garg and Kumar (2012) found that well-defined career opportunity to employees, fair pay, benefit, and the brand image of the organization offer good value and are positively related to employee engagement. Rashid et al. (2011) found a significant relationship between employee engagement and decision-making, performance and reward systems. Saks measure employee engagement using two variables, i.e. job engagement and organizational engagement. The result found that there is a positive relationship between job characteristic and perceived organizational…show more content…
Compensation and benefit, performance management, job content and learning and development are the critical predictors that he found in his study. The study of Sharma and Raina (2010) expose that career opportunity and pay were the critical predictors of job engagement, whereas objectivity and recognition explained variance for organization engagement. The three-dimensional employee engagement was measure of Schaufeli et.al. namely, vigour, dedication, and absorption also used by Chaudhary et al. (2012) in his study, and found that perceived human resource climate of the organization was positively and significantly correlated with three dimensions of engagement. According Rich et al (2010), some of the scholars, have suggested that, researchers should focus on motivational energy influence by hidden condition within an employee’s work environment that results visible
Open Document