Difference Between Papacy And The Holy Roman Empire

1074 Words5 Pages
The Class between the Papacy and the Holy Roman Empire The clash between the Papacy and the Holy Roman Empire was inevitable. After Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne emperor in 800 AD, the power struggle began. “He sent so many gifts to the Pope that it was impossible to keep count of them (Einhard 252).” Charlemagne did this to get on good terms with the pope and Roman people. Another example of the government interfering with the church is, “Edwin holds a council with his chief men about accepting the faith of Christ. High priest destroys his own altars (Bede 238).” This constant battle of power continued with later emperors. “The Holy Roman Empire was a feudal monarchy that encompassed present-day Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Austria, the Czech and Slovak Republics, as well as parts of eastern France, northern Italy, Slovenia, and western Poland at the start of the early modern centuries (Kolslofsky).” This empire was created by Charlemagne, who became Roman emperor on Christmas by Pope Leo III in 800 AD. The Western Roman Empire was without a leader since 476. The next few popes after Charlemagne failed due to political and military issues. So again, Rome was without a ruler, until the coronation of Otto I, Duke of Saxony in 962.…show more content…
He created a strong alliance with the church by appointing officials who were loyal to him. He also allowed the church to have authority over some German lands (Miller).” This started the renewing of the Holy Roman Empire. “Otto III, who ruled from 983 to 1002, made the capital of his empire Rome and declared himself emperor of the Romans (Miller).” Otto’s goal was to separate the Western Roman Empire, and he turned it into independent cites, run by Germanic nobles. He later declared himself emperor, which was followed by rebellions, which drove him out of
Show More
Related

  • What Makes Charlemagne Successful

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    After his father Pepin died in 768 (Cole, 2012), Charlemagne rose to power and controlled the kingdom his father once did. Upon doing so, he not only furthered the work of the Merovingian dynasty, he consequently created the Holy Roman Empire. The rulers before him, Clovis in particular, sought out to rule a unified kingdom. Charlemagne shared this notion and was able to “unite the Franks by the tried and true method of attacking a communing external enemy” (Cole, 2012). The way he went about uniting

    Read More

  • Who Is Charlemagne Or Charles The Great?

    1472 Words  | 6 Pages

    the great leaders of the middle Ages. He was King of the Franks and later became the Holy Roman Emperor. Charlemagne was the son of Pepin the Short, King of the Franks. Charlemagne’s father, Pepin had begun the rule of the Carolingian Empire and the golden age of the Franks. When Pepin died he left the empire to his two sons, Charlemagne and Carloman. The division between the two sons caused many problems between both Charles and Carloman eventually, but Carloman died leaving Charlemagne to receive

    Read More

  • Analytical Essay: The Third Seal And Trumpet

    1298 Words  | 6 Pages

    Like Attila the Hun obliterated the Roman Empire, people living in the modern world witness a terror of the same sort. The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, also known as ISIS, causes havoc in the Middle East. There have been kidnappings, beheadings, and mass murders. They believe it is okay to

    Read More

More about Difference Between Papacy And The Holy Roman Empire

Open Document