Difference Between Conditions, Warranties And Innominate Terms
1497 Words6 Pages
Analyze terms in contracts with reference to their meaning and effect.
Conditions, warranties and innominate terms
In most cases, the terms in a contract are not equally important. In a services contract, terms that relate to payment deadlines and the date of the service provided is probably of greater importance. Should the important terms not be fulfilled, the contract, as a whole, may be terminated. When drafting contracts, parties may highlight important parts in respect of “express terms”. In general, “conditions” are more important than “warranties”. The hierarchy of terms is carefully written out in contracts so that breaches in a contract are subjected to appropriate consequences. If a condition is breached, the opposite party may have the right to treat the contract as ended and sue the party for damages because of the unlawful termination. On the other hand, if a warranty is breached, the opposite party can only claim for damages. In the even that the hierarchies of terms are not clearly stated in the contract, a term in the contract may be classified as an “innominate” term. An Innominate term is a term in the contract that turns out to be a condition or warranty depending on the…show more content… This term includes clauses which cause the liability and administration to be too prohibitive or subject to excessive conditions. It also includes clauses which prohibit a person from trying to get a right or remedy and also includes clauses which exclude or prohibit the rules of evidence of procedure. Excusion clauses are a methods to help allocate risks within agreements. For instance, couriers have arranged services such that the owner of the good should be responsible for insurance of his property should there be damage or theft during delivery. It is perfectly reasonable for the courier to exclude or limit liability for clients’ goods during