philosophers wanted to figure out. Rene Descartes and John Locke, both great minds of their time, both pondered these questions and came to two different conclusions. In this paper I will make an endeavor that’s probably been done any times before by other philosophers. I will attempt to compare and contrast Descartes and Locke first as philosophers and then on their philosophies of self-awareness. In terms of overall theories of knowledge I will have to side with Locke. As I explain both of their theories
Shahmee Weaver Andrea Winkler LBST 275 Fall 2013 Descartes vs. Locke Rene Descartes and John Locke are both philosophical thinkers that made a big impact on history regarding rationalism vs. empiricism. Descartes, in my opinion, is a bit mysterious. Despite the fact he had a healthy dislike for the rationale of his day and age, that was in the dubious science of the academic movement, when it came down to it he was respectively proficient at twisting his own thinking when confronted with the imbedded
INTRODUCTION: Space, Time and motion were three interrelated concepts which have been very difficult by the philosophers to arrive at a proper understanding since the ancient times. By there has been consensus that a proper understanding of motion would lend a hand in addressing the questions on the nature of the other two concepts namely space and time. Depending on the nature of approach to the problem of space and time, the philosophers mainly addressed three key concerns. They are as follows: