Corruption In Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter

1619 Words7 Pages
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, a virus spreads throughout this gothic romance that malevolently affects both protagonists and antagonists, known as moral corruption. This reoccurring theme is most prevalent in namely the three main characters; Hester Prynne, Roger Chillingworth and Arthur Dimmesdale. Hawthorne creates a dystopia in the small Massachusetts Bay Colony of Salem during the 17th century, where the people condemn and damn such individuals who go against the grain so to speak. In essence, the townspeople desire a perfect world, a utopia, where everyone is a saint and a good samaritan. This puritanic code and rigid way of life bears no room for anything less than perfect moral behavior, this type of strictness inevitably…show more content…
The corruptness of his character speaks for itself, he became a doctor as a front to “befriend” Dimmesdale and eavesdrop on his life and love affair. Chillingworth literally and metaphorically sells his soul to the devil under his false identity. Every move Chillingworth’s makes is fueled with hatred and betrayal towards Hester’s romantic indiscretion. For this very reason he decides to act out vengeance and dedicate the rest of his life to making Dimmesdale’s life a living hell. Under a friendly guise, he manipulates his friendship with Dimmesdale to mentally, emotionally and physically tear him to pieces by offering harmful advice. In my opinion, “friendly fire” torture of this sort is one of the most immoral actions humanly capable because of its deliberate and premeditated intentions. As his name suggests, Chillingworth is a not a man but perhaps a demon who is indifferent to human warmth and compassion. In essence he plays the role of a leech or vampire, feeding off others by draining their happiness and sucking the life out of his victims, primarily Dimmesdale. “But as he proceeded, a terrible fascination, a kind of fierce, though still calm, necessity seized the old man within its gripe, and never set him free again, until he had done all its bidding. He now dug into the poor clergyman’s heart,…show more content…
In regards to the demeanor of Dimmesdale and Chillingworth, this analysis is very telling of how some of the cleanest looking souls are truly the dirtiest. For instance, Dimmesdale standing in place as the town priest, is supposed to be a flawless figure that represents the embodiment of moral sanctity. This aura of holiness that beams around him blinds the town folk and deceives them from seeing him for what he really is. The same facade goes for Chillingworth, being a doctor, he is portrayed as a man of integrity who practices good ethics and morals. However, this misconception couldn’t be further from the truth, he is anything but a man of warm hearted nature. In essence, both Dimmesdale and Chillingworth are able to get away with murder right in plain sight because they are least suspected of such corrupt behavior and so they are given the benefit of the doubt time after time. That being said, I believe that you can’t judge a book by its cover, just because you have a clean face doesn’t mean you have clean hands. Hawthorne picks his characters apart and leaves them fully exposed to the let the birds pluck at their sins, so to speak. In closing remarks, I find this final passage best articulates the surrender of a sinner and making amends through all of the pain and suffering. “I could be well content, that my labors, and my sorrows, and my
Open Document