Avalanche Case Study Conclusion

1437 Words6 Pages
Bill Buxton tell a story of Saul when he almost lost his life while skiing with his spouse, Judy, and some other friends. They were in terrain that they knew extremely well. And Saul was lost in glacier and covered up under nearly two meters of snowstorm but Judy excavated him out beforehand he suffocated. He further explains that how can we reduce the chances of this happening, the usual practice whenever traversing avalanche terrain is to spread out. If the risk is supposed to demand it, and always try to have viewpoints. These individuals stay in a safe position, recognizing the position of the person doing the traverse. In this way you know where the victims were last seen in the event that something happens. Judy had traversed the slope safely and was at the front, was playing the role of lookout from lower down. In that day in the avalanche they had not spread out far enough so two others in the party also got caught. One was buried up to her shoulders. Only the Saul was completely buried. The last one in the event, Steve, had detained back, and was seeing from above. In this case, there were the two individuals not caught, so both lookouts went to the aid of those caught. Steve checked up on Shane who was all right, and then instantly went to his wife. He unbound her hands, and made certain her head is above the snow. He then went downwards…show more content…
Now don’t get me wrong. I think that the graphical user interface was a great idea. But I am also equally certain that the originators (such as Johnson, Roberts, Verplank, Smith, Irby, Beard & Mackey 1989) would agree that regardless of how good it was, it was not the final word. Simply stated, user interface design in 1982 was nowhere near as mature (and therefore worthy of standardization) as the design of the

More about Avalanche Case Study Conclusion

Open Document