Autonomy In Marriage

1052 Words5 Pages
The value of marriage can differ extremely amongst all women in today’s society. This is because every individual faces diversified constricting variables such as social norms, economic status, and even personal relationships that alter their perspectives. These factors can indefinitely affect a woman’s choice towards commitment since marriage has attained institutionalized characteristics that oftentimes bribe couples to permanently become exclusive for enticing economic security, social status, and legal protection. Despite these problematic obstacles, I believe that every individual has the potential to overrule these environmental influences with the power of their own autonomy. Although these factors can be persuasive, a woman can autonomously…show more content…
Feminist, Diana Meyers, has a piece on Personal Autonomy and the Paradox of Feminine Socialization, which strongly supports the theory of autonomy deriving from the self and considering environmental aspects. Meyers persistently magnifies the belief that autonomy is defined by expressing your true self by avoiding conformist attitudes, recognizing the need for inner change, and accepting the guidance that your soul truly wants. However, if a woman was raised a certain way, those outside elements can constitute towards her autonomy. If a woman ultimately decides to pursue the obligations of traditional motherhood and marriage, she could autonomously do so if it abides by her authenticity allowing her to flourish as a human being. For example, if she was brought up to assume these tasks, it’s likely she is passionate about traditionalism. In Adrienne Rich’s book, Of Woman Born, it can be deduced that when marriage is self-ruled, it’s inescapable and is a part your individuality. This opinion can support the idea that acknowledging your inner self, all women have the opportunity to autonomously decide to seek a lifestyle consisting of heteronormative marriage, polyamorous relationships, or even remaining single if it agrees with what’s inside. If an individual disagrees with the statutes of today’s…show more content…
This is falsifiable because it does not completely exemplify the integrity of Card’s argument. In her piece, she makes extremely valid points that marriage has become overruled with artificiality due to the overbearing interference the government has. To support this stance, she points out that the job market romanticizes marriage and deems it as a necessity in order to become successfully employed or be considered as a favorable candidate for an employer. Units of government will most likely offer benefits towards a married couple rather than a single woman which could sway her towards marriage only for its perks. This is what creates a paradox in female socialization which Meyer introduces in her writing. In Meyer’s article, she clarifies that when you are assessing an individual’s autonomy, it’s crucial to consider economic necessities when you are making a choice. With this criticism, it can be deducted that women can autonomously choose marriage based on their financial needs and make a decision that will conclusively better their lives. This strengthens Card’s voice since it demonstrates how marriage has a negative connotation from the binding powers of
Open Document