Advantages Of Triangulation

1444 Words6 Pages
Introduction By combining multiple observers, theories, methods, and empirical materials, researchers can hope to overcome the weakness or intrinsic biases and the problems that come from single-method, single-observer, and single-theory studies. Often the purpose of triangulation in specific contexts is to obtain confirmation of findings through convergence of different perspectives. The point at which the perspectives converge is seen to represent reality." -- Jakob, Alexander (2001) In recent years, the need for using both Quantitative and Qualitative as a medium of research has widely increased. The whole process began to help validate and make one’s research reliable by studying various other aspects. The result of this demand has lead…show more content…
Otherwise, it wouldn’t help to produce a fitting outcome. Also, both the qualitative and quantitative methods of triangulation should be represented in a significant way in the study. There should be a justification behind employing both the methods as sometimes, one method is more sensitive to studying the phenomenon than the other. Hunt (1991) has argued that the two paradigms are dissimilar in terms of epistemology and ontology and hence the practice of using both in the same study is debatable. Moreover, triangulation cannot be adopted for all kinds of research purposes. If the time or cost constraints are present then this strategy won’t present effective results. Triangulation has been criticized on the basis of its effectiveness too. Researchers criticize the assumption of triangulation that the various sets of data obtained using different research methods can be compared and considered equally significant for studying the particular phenomenon. This assumption falls short in considering the situational and social aspects of administering and collecting data which could impact the information

More about Advantages Of Triangulation

Open Document