Even though it helps to prevent the law to be unfair or ill considered, unforeseen circumstances and changing situations in different cases may arise. Therefore, inflexibility of statutory law is another disadvantage. In contrast, common law or case law allows judges to examine the case according to individual circumstance instead of the law itself. On the other hand, because statutory laws are not made by experts in the legal field, this means there are possibilities
evidence and leave it up to the jury how much weight to give to the evidence? Would this be better than not allowing the jury to see the evidence at all? What advantages and disadvantages would there be to eliminating the parole evidence rule? The parole evidence (PE) rule is a common law rule ( derived from custom and judicial precedent rather than statutes) in contract cases that prevents a party to a written contract from presenting extrinsic evidence that discloses an ambiguity, clarifies it
“Discords are bound to arise in society and ingenious human minds have always devised ways and means for resolution of conflicts.” The world has become immensely globalised; characterized by intense exchanges of cultural, social, and commercial nature between private/public individuals or corporations. This boost in International businesses and across the border relationships are of pivotal importance and have also brought to light the lacunae in the so-called ‘globalization of the law’. However
on the advantages and disadvantages of ADR and, ultimately, its contributions in the civil justice system despite its many criticisms. When parties are in a civil dispute, they usually choose to resolve the dispute through a court hearing. In the civil justice system (‘CJS’), civil cases may begin in one of three courts; Magistrates’ Courts, County Courts and the High Court although most