Stanford Prison Experiment

1932 Words8 Pages
One of the most well-known and controversial studies in the realm of psychology was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo in the 1970s to study the effects of prison conformity on a sample group of college students. This study, known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, was scheduled to continue for two weeks, but it had to be cut short to six days due to the horrendous events that occurred during procedures. Although the majority of researchers currently agree that Zimbardo’s experiment was completely unethical, it can be said that the lessons learned from the study are extremely insightful as those lesson continue to be relevant in certain aspects of life today. Description of Design and Setup of the Study Interestingly, Zimbardo did not formulate…show more content…
During the experiment, it seemed that each participant forgot that this was just a study and that they could have left at any time. It was as though everyone thought the experimental procedures were real-life events that they could not escape. Each participant truly believed their role as either a prisoner or guard so much that their inherit personality traits were set aside and each participant embodied their assigned role to an extreme extent. For instance, the prisoners became obedient to the guards and conformed to the rules and demands set by the guard participants. The prisoners also started to show symptoms such as signs of depression, trauma, rage, crying, uncontrollable actions, and disorganized thinking. At first, some of the prisoner participants did attempt to rebel or create escape plans, whether by themselves or in groups. However, their efforts were thwarted and they gave up any attempt at rebellion. Instead, the prisoner participants assumed a very individualistic attitude in that they abandoned the solidarity of other inmate participants. Most shockingly, the inmate participants became hopeless passive dehumanized robots. Even still, five prisoner participants developed extreme depression and had to be released from the study…show more content…
I say this because the guards in Zimbardo’s experiments were not trained on how to properly deal with inmates. Although I am not an expert on how things are supposed to be in a prison, I am pretty sure that guards are not allowed to work with the prisoners until after they have completed multiple training courses. Personally, I think it was careless of Zimbardo to go through all the trouble of simulating a real prison experience, but to leave out the guards from receiving training. I believe the results would have been different if the guard participants would have at least attended a couple of real training
Show More
Related

  • Zimabardo Prison Experiment

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Prison experiment conducted by Phillip G. Zimabardo in the basement of the psychology department of Stanford University in 1971 was to study the role people played in prison situations (simplypsychology). The aim of this experiment was to determine how quickly people conformed to their roles as guards and prisoners (simplypsychology). Zimbardo’s interest in conducting this experiment was to find out whether reports of brutality within American prison system by guards were the acts of sadistic

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo, a professor and psychologist at Stanford University, conducted one of the most controversial studies in the field of the field of psychology. With a group of students, he explored the conformity of the groups of the “guards” and “prisoners” via the social identities and roles. The students volunteered for the prison study and were randomly assigned the role of a guard or prisoner. For an anticipated two weeks, the students were to follow these roles and act accordingly

    Read More

  • Philip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

    1675 Words  | 7 Pages

    Philip Zimbardo to create the Stanford Prison Study, along with influencing Stanley Milgram to create his notorious “shock” experiment. II. The Holocaust

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Ethics

    1007 Words  | 5 Pages

    Stanford Prison Experiment Ethics Heads or tails? The simple gesture of flipping a coin was the dividing line that determined ones fate. Prisoner or guard. On August 17, 1971, (Konnikova, 2015) was the morning that 24 Stanford student volunteers (Shermer, 2015) will remember for the rest of their lives. Social psychologist Phillip G. Zimbardo conducted an experiment called The Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment took place in the basement of the psychology building located at Stanford

    Read More

  • Phillip Zimbardo: The Lucifer Effect

    1495 Words  | 6 Pages

    Phillip Zimbardo developed the ideology of the “Lucifer effect” by producing an experiment that tested individuals’ behavior patterns as they switched roles in Stanford County prison. In this study, Zimbardo proved the negative face of humanistic ways by showing how influencing someone’s outlook on a specific role that they were given, can alter the overall behavior that they produce as a result. Zimbardo’s comment correlates to Arendt’s “Banality of Evil” because it is relative to Arendt’s mindset

    Read More

More about Stanford Prison Experiment

Open Document